No Apologies

Joined

• started 35 topics
• posted 959 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by No Apologies

• 
  2

  the latest change in the "generation" doctrine

  by No Apologies in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  ok i have not been keeping up-to-date on recent "new light" as some of you.

  apparently the new definition of "this generation" that came out in the the 90s, 1995-1997?

  has been replaced?.

  1. 
  2. 
• 

  No Apologies

  Whoops somehow I double-posted, thanks Watson.

  No Apologies
• 
  2

  the latest change in the "generation" doctrine

  by No Apologies in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  ok i have not been keeping up-to-date on recent "new light" as some of you.

  apparently the new definition of "this generation" that came out in the the 90s, 1995-1997?

  has been replaced?.

  1. 
  2. 
• 

  No Apologies

  Ok I have not been keeping up-to-date on recent "new light" as some of you. Apparently the new definition of "this generation" that came out in the the 90s, 1995-1997? has been replaced?

  Can someone give me an actual reference to a Watchtower magazine or other publication where this change is spelled out?

  No Apologies
• 
  9

  the latest change in the "generation" doctrine

  by No Apologies in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  ok i have not been keeping up-to-date on recent "new light" as some of you.

  apparently the new definition of "this generation" that came out in the the 90s, 1995-1997?

  has been replaced?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  No Apologies

  Ok I have not been keeping up-to-date on recent "new light" as some of you. Apparently the new definition of "this generation" that came out in the the 90s, 1995-1997? has been replaced?

  Can someone give me an actual reference to a Watchtower magazine or other publication where this change is spelled out?

  No Apologies
• 
  3

  WHAT IS WATCHTOWERS TAX GAP?

  by badboy in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  a tax gap is the difference between what a corporation pays and the theoretical amount it would pay if they didn't take advantage of loopholes..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  No Apologies

  This question makes no sense. The WT is a religion, they have no taxes, therefor there are no loopholes they need to take advantage of.

  Or you could say its all a loophole.

  No Apologies
• 
  77

  New BOE letter re: parents permitting fornication

  by sir82 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  unfortunately i have no scanner.

  but i thought y'all might like a glance into the latest mind of "mother".. i won't type out the whole thing, but just select pertinent parts to quote:.

  "to all bodies of elders.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  No Apologies

  I think some of you are blowing this into something way bigger than it is.

  If you are living under someone else's roof then they have some say in what goes on their home. I don't allow people to smoke in my house, its my house and its my rules.

  This is not a exclusive to JWs either. There are still plenty of parents who would not allow their children to share a bedroom with ther boy/girl friend when they visit.

  No Apologies
• 
  2

  How would you answer this statement?

  by elder-schmelder in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  it was during the reign of zedekiah when nebuchadnezzer destroyed jerusalem, & the bible does accurately describe the succession of the kings of judah.

  this is a statement that my grandma said to make a point that we can verify the date of 607bce as the correct date for the fall of jerusalem.

  how would you answer this statement?.

  1. 
  2. 
• 

  No Apologies

  How does that "prove" anything?

  Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Jerusalem in either 586 or 587 BCE, not 607. There is nothing in the Bible that contradicts this.

  No Apologies
• 
  12

  JW Org. spins posative light on U.N. in the 90's ???????

  by annalice in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  does anyone have the article that met the un obligations for being a ngo?.

  .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  No Apologies

  Here is a prime example, straight from the UN itself:

  Universal Declaration of Human Rights

  Check out the second article in the list.

  No Apologies
• 
  22

  Astonishing DNA complexity demolishes neo-Darwinism

  by hooberus in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  astonishing dna complexity demolishes neo-darwinism.

  paper by alex williams.

  http://creationontheweb.com/images/pdfs/tj/j21_3/j21_3_111-117.pdf.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  No Apologies

  Journal of Creation, yeah that's an unbiased source of information.

  No Apologies
• 
  29

  CO's and DO's for the Midwest.

  by AllTimeJeff in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  however you define the geographic midwest.

  the only do of consequence i had was illingworth.

  also f bartell.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  No Apologies

  Cole was DF'd??? Wow.

  Yeah Bland was kind of a character, but seemed quite popular.

  Lot of names I recognize from this list. Don Friend, Doug Hunter... Then there was Gary(?) Wells. Bobby Christian. Bennett, short little DO tyrant. ANd of course Chuck Velours. Ray Harriman was also a very popular CO back in the 70s.

  No Apologies
• 
  20

  There can be no better anthem for X-witnesses.....

  by eyeslice in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  from the fabulous joni mitchell who sings and looks like an angel.

  i am sure for many of us who placed our dreams with the watchtower's empty promises, it is the perfect anthem.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  No Apologies

  Eyeslice that is a good song for xJW.

  My other favorite xJW anthem:

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g50vzZzAja0

  No Apologies(who can't figure out how to embed a Youtube video)